In the recent hours a number of reporting station in city locations
reported more then 3 inches of rainfall - a storm report in The
Carolina's reported over three inces in 45 minutes with flooding in
streets - the only proof of Flooding on the scope of television has
shown in Florida - How would 3 stations in city locations in Louisiana
get such great amount of rainfall to 6 and 7 inches after such federal
law that Storm drains are corrected since 1999 and later a larger
storm again corrected such local to Federal Law but communities under
100,000 have no provision for such Storm drainage problem as
precipitation in such small Communties are in the rain shadow of
Congress lee wind - in that why would New Orleans take tap water to
fill a rain gauge? When in law the Cherry bed is already in front of
them - I do not write a Editor opinion - only writing how a law has
become varying to the one who carries the bucket to the rain gauge
while 100 million viewers watch selected Storms for funding - Here is
the just of the matter Congress is either windward or lee wind to
rural - at least that way the little farmer with Flooded pasture can
learn from the city what is the best size of the bucket to use and
timing of when to match the Real McCoy to The Tap water filled rain
gauge - [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 235 (Wednesday, December8,
1999)][Rules and Regulations] 40 CFR Parts 9, 122, 123, and
124National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System--Regulations for
Revision of the Water Pollution Control Program Addressing Storm Water
Discharges; Final RuleReport to Congress on the Phase II Storm Water
Regulations; NoticeFederal Register / Vol. 64, No. 235/ Wednesday,
December 8, 1999 / Rules and Regulations[[Page 68722]]ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY40 CFR Parts 9, 122, 123, and 124[FRL--6470-8]RIN
2040-AC82National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System--Regulations
for
Revision of the Water Pollution Control Program Addressing Storm Water
DischargesAGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).ACTION: Final
rule.-----------------------------------------------------------------------SUMMARY:
Today's regulations (Phase II) expand the existing National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) storm water program (Phase I) to
address storm water discharges from small municipal separate storm
sewer systems (MS4s) (those serving less than 100,000 persons) and
construction sites that disturb one to five acres. Although these
sources are automatically designated by today'srule, the rule allows
for the exclusion of certain sources from the national program based
on a demonstration of the lack of impact on water quality, as well as
the inclusion of others based on a higher likelihood of localized
adverse impact on water quality. Today's regulations also exclude from
the NPDES program storm water discharges from industrial facilities
that have ``no exposure'' of industrial activities or materials to
storm water. Finally, today's rule extends from August 7, 2001 until
March 10, 2003 the deadline by which certain industrial facilities
owned by small MS4s must obtain coverage under an NPDES permit. This
rule establishesa cost-effective, flexible approach for reducing
environmental harm by storm water discharges from many point sources
of storm water that are currently unregulated. EPA believes that the
implementation of the six minimum measures identified for small MS4s
should significantly reduce pollutants in urban storm water compared
to existing levels in a cost-effective manner. Similarly, EPA believes
thatimplementation of Best Management
Practices (BMP) controls at small construction sites will also result
in a significant reduction in pollutant discharges and an improvement
in surface water quality. EPA believes this rule will result in
monetized financial, recreational and health benefits, as well as
benefits that EPA has been unable to monetize. Expected benefits
include reduced scouring and erosion of streambeds, improved aesthetic
quality of waters, reduced eutrophication of aquatic systems, benefit
to wildlife and endangered and threatened species, tourism benefits,
biodiversity benefits and reduced costs for siting reservoirs. In
addition, the costs of industrial storm water controls will decrease
due to the exclusion of storm waterdischarges from facilities where
there is ``no exposure'' of storm water to industrial activities and
materials.DATES: This regulation is effective on February 7, 2000. The
incorporation by reference of the rainfall erosivity factor
publication listed in the rule is approved by the Director of the
Federal Register as of February 7, 2000. For judicialreview purposes,
this final rule is promulgated as of 1:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time,
on December 22, 1999 as provided in 40 CFR 23.2.ADDRESSES: The
complete administrative record for the final rule and the ICR have
been established underdocket numbers W-97-12 (rule) and
W-97-15 (ICR), and includes supporting documentation as well as
printed, paper versions of electroniccomments.
--
President of The United States
Guy Ralph Perea Sr President of The United States
Weatherdata1046am0426 a Discussion Group of
Weatherdata<http://groups.google.com/group/weatherdata1046am0426>
USFMSC
http://www.cityfreq.com/ca/avalon/
QUALIFY
http://ptusss.blogspot.com/2012/08/proof-of-weather-spotter-qualify.html
OCCUPS
http://www.occupationalinfo.org/02/025062010.html
goldlandabstracts; link check
own search engine - The United
States International Policies
http://apps.facebook.com/faceblogged/?uid=1340855784
http://lnk.ms/8d5gl aol
http://groups.google.com/group/united-states-of-american
http://ptusss.blogspot.com/
http://twitter.com/guyperea
http://twitter.com/ptusss Federal Communication
Commission<http://columbiabroadcast.spaces.live.com/>
Ambassador Chevy Chase; Kevin Corcran; Jack Nickolas; Cher; Shirley Temple
Black; Liza Minnille; Ansari; Ernest Tascoe; Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
Agent Jodie Foster; Department of Veterans Affairs Director George H.W. Bush
Title 22 USCS section 1928 (b) The e-mail
transmission may contain legally privileged information that
is intended only for the individual or entity recipient, you are hereby,
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the
contents of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
E-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so arrangements
can be made for proper delivery. Title 42
USCS section 192 etseq Margie Paxton Chief of Childrens Bureau of as
Director of The United States Department of Human Services; Defendant
Article IV General Provisions Section 2
(Supreme Law of The Land) The Constitution of The United States "Any thing
in The Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary Notwithstanding"
Contrary to Law (of an act or omission) illegal;
https://plus.google.com/100487463984952448443
https://twitter.com/presidentus1
http://ptusss.blogspot.com/2012/03/march-19-2012-rules-federal-swordfish_18.html
No comments:
Post a Comment